Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Vermont payment reform and new case‑management rules prompt warnings of service cuts for people with disabilities

2780535 · March 26, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

State officials outlined a new payment model tied to SIS‑A assessments; family members and providers warned the change — combined with conflict‑free case management — could destabilize supports for dozens of Vermonters unless rollout is delayed and reassessments performed.

At a House Human Services Committee meeting at the State House, department officials described a new payment model for Medicaid‑funded developmental‑disability services while family members and designated‑agency leaders warned the change could force service reductions and housing losses for some people who rely on those supports.

Jessica Bernard, Deputy Director of Payment Reform, told the committee that “payment reform is a response to some audit findings,” and described an approach that ties individualized budget ranges to a standardized assessment (the Supports Intensity Scale for Adults, SIS‑A), uses Medicaid encounter data and a utilization factor to set monthly payments, and builds in a 5% flexibility pool and a 3% reconciliation corridor for providers.

The proposed model aims to increase transparency, accountability and equitable distribution of resources across the state, Bernard said, but providers and families said the model — and the timing of its rollout alongside federally required conflict‑free case management — risks disrupting services for people in shared living and other residential arrangements.

Why this matters

The payment changes would shift how designated agencies and specialized service agencies receive monthly payments and how certain items are funded (for example, vehicle and home modifications and some clinical services would move to fee‑for‑service). Providers would receive a monthly payment based on an agency’s aggregate individual service budgets and an expected utilization percentage (Bernard said agencies often deliver around 80% of authorized services). The model also includes: a 5% flexibility pool on budgets; a provision allowing shared‑living provider agencies…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans