Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Healthy Streets topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board discusses Healthy Streets pilot for Lower Perkins Way; city staff note process and neighbor consent requirement

2779315 · March 26, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lake Forest Park — Advisory board members discussed a neighborhood pilot to partially close or traffic-calming Lower Perkins Way under the city's Healthy Streets concept and asked how parks staff could support outreach, design and community planting.

Lake Forest Park — Advisory board members discussed a neighborhood pilot to partially close or traffic-calming Lower Perkins Way under the city's Healthy Streets concept and asked how parks staff could support outreach, design and community planting.

One board member described a state legislative bill that would allow substantially lower default speed limits for designated streets and said the proposal prompted renewed interest in a pilot program for Lower Perkins. Participants discussed temporary or pilot approaches that use planters, paint or movable barriers to reduce through-traffic and create safer walking spaces.

Corey, a city staff member, described the administrative process for signage and temporary installations: "If it's temporary, we have ... a signed permit that we would just submit and get approval. If it's more permanent type of thing, that would be a public works project we run by and figure out how much that would be," Corey said. Board members also noted the city's requirement that a Healthy Streets conversion include neighborhood consent; one participant said the ordinance calls for roughly 70% neighbor approval for a permanent change.

Nut graf: The idea is to pilot a Healthy Streets measure on Lower Perkins Way to improve pedestrian space and reduce speed; participants proposed low-cost pilot treatments and volunteer-maintained plantings, but noted the multistep process, neighborhood-consent threshold and staff workload that affect timing.

Members suggested partnering with local groups for outreach and long-term stewardship (Stewardship Foundation and neighborhood volunteers), using temporary materials for trial runs, and exploring educational outreach such as a local urbanism book club and public meetings. City staff noted that implementation would likely require multiple years because of competing priorities and limited staff capacity.

Ending: Board members agreed to keep the idea on the work plan for possible pilot design and community outreach; any permanent or semi-permanent changes would require public works design review, permit approvals and neighborhood consent under existing city practice.