Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Emergency Services topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Lewiston 9-1-1 plans, Auburn call-center proposal and county collaboration discussed; no relocation decision made

2779002 · March 26, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Directors from Lewiston 9-1-1 and councilors discussed options for relocating the city's dispatch center, including 85 Park Street; staff said space is constrained and consolidation with the county remains possible but complex.

Director Hall presented the 9-1-1 budget and updated the council on relocation conversations. He said the search for a new permanent home for the Lewiston center began in 2021 when Auburn planned its public-safety building, and that 85 Park Street (a Lewiston-owned facility under discussion) was chosen for more detailed review earlier in the process. Director Hall said construction estimates for a fully hardened 9-1-1 center at some alternatives he and staff reviewed would be substantial; he noted a previously estimated cost of roughly $4,000,000 for certain retrofit scenarios and that the city and county have studied options.

Councilors asked whether other municipal spaces could accommodate the day-to-day operations of the Lewiston center. Director Hall said he had reviewed city-owned properties and found no practical, ready-to-occupy alternatives large enough for the center and its needs without major renovation. He also described operational collaboration with Androscoggin County: current systems are interconnected and mutual backup is already in place for high call volume. Director Hall said the county and city already collaborate on computer-aided dispatch and radio infrastructure; the county helped fund a shared radio tower and certain IT work.

Councillors asked about co-location and consolidation. Director Hall said that footprint-wise, 85 Park Street could accommodate county and municipal operations if redesigned and that conversations about shared services continue; he cautioned, however, that co-location reduces physical redundancy (if both centers are in the same building they share some single points of failure). The council did not take a final vote on relocation or consolidation at the meeting.