Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Roundup Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Landmarks Commission approves several applications, withdraws one item
Summary
At its March 24 meeting the Canal Winchester Landmarks Commission approved exterior changes including gas porch lanterns, a fence, a wall sign and a roof replacement; one item (garage doors) was withdrawn by the applicant.
At its March 24 meeting the Canal Winchester Landmarks Commission approved a series of staff‑presented applications covering exterior changes on historic‑district properties and accepted the withdrawal of one application scheduled for review.
Approved items included:
- CA25-005 (17 North Trine Street): Approval to replace two existing electric porch lights with matching natural‑gas porch lanterns in matte black. Roll call: unanimous yes (Roger White; Whit Wardell; Patrick Lynch; Linda Henry; Rich Doudna; David Craighead).
- CA25-008 (215 Washington Street): Approval of a 36‑inch aluminum perimeter fence and associated gates around the rear yard of a double lot; evergreen plantings were proposed inside the fence for screening. Roll call: unanimous yes among commissioners present.
- CA25-009 (108 North High Street): Approval of an overlaid wall sign adding a second tenant identification (co‑branding) to identify multiple products (staff said the address numerals remain 12 inches for visibility). Roll call: approval recorded by roll call vote.
- CA25-010 (84 East Columbus Street): Approval to replace existing three‑tab shingles with IKO gray dimensional asphalt shingles and to install seamless white gutters; the applicant said garage roof and rear gutters will be replaced concurrently. Roll call: approval recorded by roll call vote.
Withdrawn item:
- CA25-011 (126 East Water Street): The applicant withdrew the garage‑door/man‑door application from the agenda and will return with a revised scope next month.
Each of the approved items was presented with photographs and material samples or manufacturer names in staff packets; commissioners asked routine clarifying questions about mounting, gates and material finishes, and staff noted that any significant deviations from approved details should return to the commission for review.
