Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Inmate Medical Transfers topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission hears concerns about inmate transfers to out‑of‑county hospitals; law‑enforcement committee to meet

2777064 · March 25, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners raised budget concerns after jurors reported deputies traveling to Nashville with inmates; Adam, the county EMS director, explained transfers occurred when local hospitals lacked the specialty needed and the sheriff's office will meet with the law‑enforcement committee to review practices and costs.

Commissioners discussed inmate medical transfers to hospitals outside Bradley County after jurors reported deputies traveling to Nashville to accompany inmates for care. Commissioner Alford asked county EMS director Adam to explain the transfers and potential budget effects.

Adam said the recent cases involved patients for whom the local hospital did not have the required specialty available at the time. He described one inmate transferred to Knoxville to see an ear‑nose‑throat specialist and another whose eye condition required urgent specialist evaluation; in both examples the local facility lacked the specialty on call or available at that hour. He emphasized he could not speak for hospital decision‑making and that hospital capabilities vary; he also said hospitals must treat emergency patients but may transfer when they lack a specialty.

On budgetary impact, Adam said the county’s expenses increase when deputies must travel with inmates—overtime and overnight lodging are real costs for the sheriff’s office—but he said he could not provide the medical bills without seeing invoices. Commissioners and staff also noted that litigation and class‑action suits involving jail medical care statewide have made providers and detainment officials more cautious about transfers.

After discussion the chairman and commissioners agreed it would be appropriate for the law‑enforcement committee to meet with the sheriff to examine the issue further; the chairman asked that the committee coordinate a date with staff (Laurie). No formal vote was recorded; the committee meeting will be scheduled as a follow‑up so commissioners can get more detail about frequency, costs and whether in‑house medical decisions align with contract expectations.

Attributions: direct explanations of transfer reasons are attributed to Adam; the committee referral was made by the chairman and accepted by commissioners.