Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board tables panhandling ordinance after debate over enforcement, ATM buffer and legal thresholds
Summary
A proposed ordinance targeting aggressive panhandling was tabled after aldermen and the police chief discussed enforceability under state law, distinctions between disorderly conduct/assault and city‑level fines, and whether the 20‑foot ATM buffer should be increased.
The Board considered a first reading of an ordinance to amend Title 9 (business, peddlers, solicitors) to address panhandling (proposed 2025‑O‑7). Aldermen discussed distinctions between charitable solicitation and aggressive or intimidating panhandling and sought clarity on enforcement and appropriate penalties.
Chief Jones and other speakers said many aggressive behaviors could already be addressed under state criminal statutes (disorderly conduct, assault, intimidation) but that a city ordinance could provide a streamlined citation route into city court for lesser conduct. Alderman Robertson suggested increasing a proposed 20‑foot buffer around ATMs and financial institutions to 50 feet to protect privacy when customers withdraw cash; several aldermen supported revising that distance.
Several aldermen said they preferred to keep an option for police to escalate matters to state court where conduct warranted jail time, and Judge Blanton (present in the meeting) described the higher criminal standard required for state prosecutions versus a civil fine in city court. Alderman Collins and others said the proposed $50 fine in the draft was modest and would not replace state criminal charges when appropriate.
Outcome: Alderman Evans moved to table the ordinance for further work with sponsors and staff; the motion to table passed by unanimous voice vote. Sponsors indicated they will reconvene with Chief Jones and the city attorney to refine definitions (e.g., "aggressive panhandling" versus charitable solicitation), enforcement options, and the ATM buffer distance before returning the ordinance to the board.
Ending: The item was tabled unanimously; staff and sponsors will prepare revised language and consider two sessions of outreach to public safety shifts for feedback before returning to the board.
