Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission sets April 28 public hearing for revised comprehensive plan and debates language on local land‑use authority
Summary
The commission voted unanimously to set a public hearing April 28 on updates to the county comprehensive plan, including proposed language asserting local land‑use decision authority; legal counsel and commissioners debated tightening the wording to avoid over‑stating rights under Virginia’s Dillon Rule.
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Buckingham County Planning Commission voted unanimously to set a public hearing for April 28 to consider updates to the county’s comprehensive plan, including proposed policy language about local control over land-use decisions.
Why it matters: The discussion centered on draft language that would assert local responsibility — and, as drafted, call land-use decision-making a “right” of local residents and taxpayers. Legal counsel and multiple commissioners said the intent to assert local authority was understandable, but they urged caution in wording because Virginia’s Dillon Rule limits local government authority to powers granted by the state.
Legal advice and debate: County legal counsel (Mr. Wright) reviewed the draft language in the meeting and suggested modifying the wording to avoid stating an absolute, enduring right that could be misleading if state law changes. Counsel suggested alternative phrasing that would express support for local decision-making while acknowledging that authority is granted by the Commonwealth and could change.
Commission reaction: Some commissioners — citing recent legislative activity and continuing debate over state-level land-use bills — advocated for a stronger statement in support of local control and said they would be willing to include a firm policy stance in the comprehensive plan. Others, including the commission chair and Mr. Wright, recommended a moderated phrasing. Commissioners agreed that both the original draft and counsel’s revised language would be made available to the public before the April 28 hearing for comment.
Motion and next steps: A motion to send the comprehensive plan updates, including both the original and the revised suggested language, to a public hearing on April 28 passed unanimously. Commissioners asked staff to provide the two versions of the proposed language in the public hearing materials and to solicit any additional wording suggestions from commissioners in the interim.
What’s next: The Planning Commission will consider public comments at its April 28 public hearing and then craft a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors based on that input and any further legal advice.

