Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Art Sculpture Loan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews loan-to-purchase offer for bronze sculpture by Gillian Mark; staff directed to explore partners
Summary
Art in Public Places members discussed a year-long loan with purchase option for a 7-foot bronze sculpture by artist Gillian Mark (retail $132,000; one-year loan $33,000, loan applies toward purchase at half price). Board asked staff to pursue partnership options; no formal purchase vote recorded.
Elise Rafa, Community Development Coordinator for Martin County, told the Art in Public Places advisory board that she and staff were contacted by the global project manager for the artist Gillian Mark about a possible temporary installation in Martin County.
"They don't wanna show their art really anywhere, and they were interested in Martin County," Rafa said, describing the outreach and the artist's interest.
Rafa told the board the bronze sculpture under consideration retails for $132,000, that the county could secure a one-year loan for $33,000 and that the $33,000 loan payment would apply toward a purchase price if the county chose to buy the piece after the loan period at "half the price," as presented in the staff summary. Rafa said the sculpture is roughly 7 feet tall, about 780 pounds, made of bronze and that only six editions of this piece were created.
Staff described potential installation locations including the riverwalk, the patio area, Jensen Beach and Hope Sound, and noted private- and public-sector partnership options such as the community redevelopment agency (CRA), the city of Stuart or private developers (Rio Marine Village, Riverlight, Jensen-area development). Rafa and other staff emphasized that the loan price would include insurance and shipping and that the artist’s team would provide a PR package; board members discussed installation anchoring, wind loads and the likely need for a structural engineer and county permits.
Board members and staff discussed possible funding approaches—loan-only with a private partner or a loan that the county would later convert to purchase if funding allowed—and emphasized vetting any private developer site with the artist. A board member asked whether installation was included; staff said the loan fee covers shipping and insurance but local structural work and permits would be a county responsibility. Rafa and other members suggested reaching out to the Chamber of Commerce, private developers and potential corporate partners to offset the loan or purchase cost.
The chair asked if a motion was needed to pursue the opportunity and several members voiced support for staff to continue negotiations and vetting potential partners; the transcript records discussion and informal backing but does not record a formal motion, named mover/second or a board vote authorizing purchase.
Because the board did not record a formal purchase vote at this meeting, no purchase or appropriation was authorized. Staff said they would return with a specific deal for board consideration after pursuing partnership and site options.
