Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Subdivision Final Approval topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

DRC conditionally approves Stratton Meadows final plat, asks for bond estimates

2772176 · March 25, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Development Review Committee granted conditional final approval for the Stratton Meadows subdivision final plat on March 25, requiring red-line corrections and asking the applicant for estimated roadway quantities for a construction bond.

The Development Review Committee conditionally approved the Stratton Meadows subdivision final plat at its March 25 meeting, directing the applicant to address red-line corrections and to submit estimated roadway quantities so the city can prepare a bond estimate.

The approval covers the final plat for Stratton Meadows, a subdivision at the north end of town between 770 North Royalland Drive and 200 East. The committee noted the subdivision previously received preliminary approval and said most utility matters were resolved during that stage.

Committee members flagged a handful of cleanup items on the plat, including updating signature blocks to reflect the correct owners (the plat currently lists Stratton Acres LLC but the applicant indicated Meritage Homes), removing a surveyor watermark, and reconciling partial numbers and address table entries for corner lots that could face either 200 East or 770. The committee said those items should be corrected before final recording.

"I'll make a motion to conditionally approve the Stratton Meadows final plat," said Ryan, staff member. Ryan added the condition that the "red lines" noted by staff be addressed. The motion received a second and passed on a voice vote.

After the vote the committee asked the applicant to provide estimated quantities for road construction so staff can assemble a bond tab. "If you could also, as part of this, send over estimated quantities for the roadways and what so that we can get a bond tab put together," the chair said. When asked whether that meant an engineer's estimate, the applicant representative confirmed it did.

The committee also approved the minutes of its March 11, 2025, meeting by motion and voice vote and then adjourned.

Next steps identified by the committee include the applicant returning a revised plat that addresses the listed red-line edits and providing the roadway estimate so the city can determine bonding requirements prior to construction.