Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Disciplinary Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board accepts proposed consent order after added educational requirement; one recusal
Summary
The board accepted a proposed consent order that was revised to include an educational requirement. The motion passed with recorded ayes and one board member recused from the vote.
The board voted to accept a proposed consent order that had been revised to include an educational requirement.
The chair said the consent order was the same document reviewed in December, with the educational provision the primary change. Bev (board staff) confirmed the educational requirement had been added: “Correct.” The chair then asked for a motion to accept the consent order; a board member moved and Monica seconded. Board attorney Craig recused himself from the vote. The chair called for those in favor, and the board answered “Aye” three times before the chair noted one recusal and said the consent order was accepted.
The chair explained that the board had previously submitted recommendations to alter the proposed consent order and that those recommended changes were incorporated. "I don't see any issues with this consent order as it is written now," the chair said during the discussion.
No further details about the subject of the consent order (the respondent, alleged violations, or sanction terms) were provided in the meeting transcript. The acceptance was recorded as a formal action; Craig's recusal was noted on the record. The chair did not assign follow-up tasks or set additional deadlines related to this item during the meeting.
