Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Federal Waiver Memorial topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee introduces joint memorial urging federal action on four pending waivers after divided votes
Summary
The committee voted to introduce RS 32327, a house joint memorial asking federal Health and Human Services to approve four waiver requests submitted in February 2019. A substitute motion to return the request to the sponsor failed on a roll call; the introduction passed on a subsequent roll call vote.
Get email alerts on the Federal Waiver Memorial topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The House Health and Welfare Committee introduced RS 32327, a house joint memorial asking the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to act on four waiver requests submitted in February 2019. Representative Jordan Redmond presented the RS on behalf of the federal delegation’s request.
The memorial’s language says the state has “yet to receive a formal response” on the pending waivers, language that prompted questions from committee members who said the federal response in 2019 included denials and technical explanations. Representative Elaine Fuhrman offered a substitute motion to return the memorial to the sponsor for rewording, arguing the committee should not assert it had received no formal response when it had. The substitute failed on a roll call vote, recorded as 5 ayes and 10 nays.
Committee members also asked for more information about the specific waivers at issue and who in the federal delegation requested the memorial. Representative Redmond said he had worked with David Ripley and the federal delegation and offered to supply details if the RS received a full hearing.
After discussion the committee proceeded to a roll call on whether to introduce RS 32327; the motion passed on a roll call vote recorded as 10 ayes and 5 nays. The RS is now introduced and will move forward in the process for possible further committee consideration.
The memorial is an expression of legislative preference to federal agencies and does not itself change state law or appropriate funds. Committee members asked the sponsor to provide documentation of the waiver requests and any federal correspondence if the RS moves to a full hearing.
