Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Newborn Screening Statute topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances bill moving newborn screening and ocular antibiotic prophylaxis from rules to statute
Summary
The House Health and Welfare Committee sent Senate Bill 1014 to the floor with a due-pass recommendation after presenters and the Department of Health and Welfare said the change moves long-standing screening requirements from administrative rules into statute while preserving parental refusal rights.
The House Health and Welfare Committee voted to send Senate Bill 1014 to the floor with a due-pass recommendation after debate over moving newborn-screening rules into statute. Representative Healy, District 15, West Boise, carried the bill in committee and told members it "doesn't change anything" about parents' rights to decline newborn screening.
Healy said the bill moves longstanding screening practices into statute: "This has been around for 100 years." He added parents retain the right to refuse: "parents can say no, they don't have to have it." Representative Kaler asked specifically about ocular antibiotic prophylaxis language in the bill (citing the bill text) and whether the measure would mandate application at all births; Healy replied that parents can decline the antibiotic.
Jared Larson, legislative and regulatory affairs chief for the Department of Health and Welfare, told the committee the requirement dates back to 1921 and that the department selected items to move from administrative code into statute starting with the oldest, long-standing requirements: "This was the first one we brought over because we recognized that the initial requirement dates back to 1921 and the practice was so long standing." The chair and other members said moving rules to statute increases legislative oversight because statutes are changed through bills and thus require legislative action.
Representative Fuhrman asked why this particular rule was chosen to bring into statute; Healy said he could not explain the agencies' selection criteria. The committee's discussion emphasized that the bill is intended to codify existing practice rather than to create a new mandatory medical requirement.
The committee motion to send Senate Bill 1014 to the floor with a due-pass recommendation passed; the transcript records the chair voting aye. Several members voiced support during discussion.
