Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Annexation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council holds public hearings on annexation of Lutz Road parcels for solar project and Trinity Lutheran expansion
Summary
Council opened and closed two public hearings on annexation agreements for the north and south portions of a long, narrow parcel at the western terminus of Lutz Road; plan commission recommended annexation and rezoning to agricultural for both purchasers, and no public opposition was recorded at the hearings.
The Bloomington City Council on March 24 opened and closed two public hearings on proposed annexation agreements for adjacent parcels at the western terminus of Lutz Road.
Development Services Director Kelly Pfeiffer told the council the south parcel, roughly 17 acres south of Lutz Road near Business 55, is under contract to a solar developer that proposes a leased solar facility. The north portion is under contract to Trinity Lutheran Church for potential future campus expansion and stormwater detention; staff said there are no immediate development plans for that tract.
Pfeiffer said both annexation agreements postpone standard city development requirements until a specific use is proposed, because the sites lack nearby water and sewer and are not currently served. The planning commission held hearings in January and forwarded unanimous recommendations for annexation and rezoning to AG (agricultural) for both contracts, Pfeiffer said. She also said no one spoke in opposition at the planning commission hearing.
Deputy City Manager Tyus said the city pursued annexation — rather than allowing county subdivision — to secure control over right-of-way and future development impacts as the area develops. He said the agreements help the city coordinate future infrastructure and land uses in that corridor.
No members of the public testified at either hearing when the council opened public comment, and both hearings were closed within minutes. Staff indicated petitioners’ attorneys were present for questions but none were raised. The council did not take final adoption votes on the annexation agreements at the March 24 meeting; the hearings were part of the annexation and rezoning process and will return for further action as required by code.
Clarifying details: staff said Lutz Road is substandard and seasonally accessible in places; the south parcel is intended for a 30‑year lease with a 10‑year renewal for a solar lease, and neither parcel is currently served by water and sewer (roughly a mile from services in places). The planning commission’s recommendation was unanimous for annexation and rezoning to AG for both contracts.
The hearings record that city staff will defer standard development activity until an actual planned use is proposed and that future infrastructure requirements would apply at that time.
