Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Diversity Equity Inclusion topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate adopts DEI resolution after heated debate, 19-18
Summary
Senate Resolution 18, affirming diversity, equity, and inclusion as foundational principles, was adopted 19-18 after floor debate featured sharply divided remarks from both parties.
Get email alerts on the Diversity Equity Inclusion topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Michigan Senate adopted Senate Resolution 18, affirming diversity, equity, and inclusion as essential principles, by a narrow 19-18 roll-call vote, the secretary announced.
Senator Stephanie Chang, the resolution sponsor, said the measure affirms that diversity, equity, and inclusion "are essential foundational principles for achieving the American dream" and urged colleagues to "widen pathways for achieving the American dream in every community so that all people can reap the benefits of shared prosperity." She asked that her remarks be printed in the journal and described DEI policies as tools to "remove barriers to opportunity, strengthening productivity, increasing innovation, and building a healthy vibrant economy."
Opponents framed the resolution differently. Senator Runstead characterized "equity" as demanding outcomes and argued the resolution sidelined other priorities, saying, "equity means an outcome. Demanding an outcome. Not equality, where everyone gets an equal chance, but making sure an outcome is achieved, which is against the fourteenth amendment equal protection clause." He also criticized the majority for prioritizing the resolution over legislation addressing the fentanyl crisis.
Senator Irwin expressed support for the resolution, saying the state should "widen the circle" and bring more people into opportunity. Minority Leader Nesbitt submitted a statement as his no-vote explanation, which was ordered printed in the journal.
The secretary reported "19 aye votes, 18 no votes, and 0 excused." With a majority of members elected and serving having voted in favor, the resolution was adopted.
Floor debate included questions about the scope and meaning of "equity" and whether the chamber's priorities matched constituent needs. The resolution was considered under immediate consideration after suspension of the rules and there were no amendments pending at the time of adoption.
