Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: key motions approved by Keith County commissioners on Feb. 26
Summary
A concise list of formal board actions taken at the Feb. 26 Keith County Board of Commissioners meeting, including motions to adopt the 1‑and‑6 year road plan, approve visitor grants, accept RFP submissions and routine procedural items.
The Keith County Board of Commissioners recorded the following formal actions on Feb. 26. All votes below passed by roll call unless noted.
- Adopt 1‑and‑6 year road plan as presented by the Highway Superintendent. Motion by Schroeder; second by Wartman. Vote: Anderson — yes; Wartman — yes; Schroeder — yes; Bridal — yes; Crandall — yes.
- Approve travel request for Cody Fenwick (attendance at a March MPZA conference). Motion by Anderson; second by Schroeder. Vote: unanimous yes.
- Approve the minutes of the previous meeting. Motion by Anderson; second by Wartman. Vote: unanimous yes.
- Approve payment of claims. Motion by Schroeder; second by Wortman/Wartman. Vote: unanimous yes.
- Approve Boot Hill Committee visitor grant $2,500 for brochures. Motion by Wortman; second by Anderson. Vote: unanimous yes.
- Approve Keith County Ag Society visitor grant $17,500 (50%) for fairgrounds concrete/accessibility. Motion by Wortman; second by Schroeder. Vote: unanimous yes.
- Approve Western Trails Creative District (KCAD) visitor grant $50,000 toward sculpture pads, signage and related projects. Motion by Anderson; second by Wartman. Vote: unanimous yes.
- Opened and accepted sealed RFP submissions for Lakeview West engineering (no contract awarded). The board directed the highway superintendent to review proposals and report back. Motion by Schroeder; second by Anderson. Vote: unanimous yes.
Routine procedural approvals (agenda, minutes, claims) were handled by unanimous roll‑call votes earlier in the meeting.
For each motion the meeting record shows callers and roll‑call responses; no recorded ‘no’ votes were taken on the above actions.
