Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Policies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board advances second reading of phone, sick‑leave and health policies; cell‑phone rules draw debate
Summary
The Elizabeth School District board advanced several personnel and student policies on March 24 — approving second readings of a consolidated sick‑leave bank policy and health‑education rules and moving a new personal‑technology (cell‑phone) policy to the next stage while tabling the repeal of an older classified sick‑bank policy.
The Elizabeth School District Board of Education on March 24 advanced or approved multiple personnel and student‑policy items and held extended discussion of a proposed student personal‑technology policy (cell‑phone rules).
Votes at a glance
- GBGH (replacement) — Sick Leave Bank (second reading): board approved second reading (roll call: Callahan Aye; Fletcher Aye; Olson Aye; Powell Aye; Waller Aye). The policy consolidates sick‑leave bank rules across employee classifications and maintains separate lead banks for classified and licensed employees; it will return for a third and final reading.
- GDCA (classified sick bank) — repeal: board moved to table the repeal until the consolidated bank (GBGH) is finalized (motion to table approved by roll call; all ayes).
- JICJ (second reading) — Student Use of Cell Phones and Other Personal Technology Devices: board approved the second reading (not final adoption). The policy (as discussed) would prohibit students in pre‑K through 12 from using PTDs on school premises during the school day (with specified exceptions), require devices to be silenced and stored in backpacks or school‑designated locations, and allow use during lunch and certain non‑instructional activities subject to final language. The board asked staff to clarify language about which grades and when (for example, high‑school lunch), transportation and field trips, and to provide procedures for secure storage when staff take custody of devices.
- IHAM and IHAM‑R — Health Education policy and regulation (second readings): board approved the revisions to rename and narrow the policy to health education (the district is not adopting a separate comprehensive sex‑education curriculum), and approved the regulation that provides a parent exemption form and procedure.
- IKE (first reading) — Ensuring All Students Meet Standards: first reading approved; board will return for second reading. The policy clarifies promotion/retention triggers and notification timing.
- ILBC and ILBC‑R (first readings) — Early Literacy and Reading Comprehension: first readings approved; these align the district policy with recent Read Act changes and add implementation details (screening, interventions, retention considerations). Board discussed dyslexia screening, take‑flight intervention plans, and the role of IEPs/504 plans in exemption or accommodation.
Cell‑phone policy: extended discussion
Board members and parents had submitted about 290 survey responses used to inform the cell‑phone policy discussion. Members said the policy intent is to reduce instructional distraction while preserving parent contact for emergencies. Director Callahan summarized parent feedback: many support restrictions during instruction and passing periods but some wanted phone use allowed at lunch. "The purpose of the policy is you can have your phone in your possession. It's just in your backpack and not in use," Callahan said.
Board members debated details that staff will refine with TAC and CAC: whether elementary and middle school students should be cleared for device use at lunch, whether high‑school students should have lunch‑period device privileges, whether buses and field trips should permit device use, whether silencing versus powering off should be required, and how to securely store devices when staff retain them after repeated violations. Several members recommended a single, consistent procedure across schools rather than ad‑hoc teacher practices, and proposed options such as secure office lockers or classroom pouches for confiscated devices; staff will weigh cost, operational concerns, and emergency access before returning recommended procedures.
Next steps
- Staff will take board edits to TAC and CAC, revise policy/regulation language (clarify grade bands, bus/field‑trip rules, storage and handling procedures, and exception language for medical or IEP/504 needs), and resend the community survey for additional feedback.
- The GBGH policy will return for a third and final reading, and the district will hold the repeal of the old classified sick‑bank policy until GBGH is finalized.
Ending: Board members asked staff to return revised language and implementation procedures before final votes; the board received several second readings as votes to advance policy work but left operational procedures to administrators for consistent implementation.
