Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pension Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances PERA transparency bill after stakeholders and PERA express support
Summary
Senate Bill 147, a bipartisan measure to add transparency requirements to PERA board activities and to require online posting of specified meeting materials and financial information, advanced from the House Finance Committee to Appropriations on a unanimous vote, 13-0.
The House Finance Committee voted unanimously, 13-0, to send Senate Bill 147 to the Appropriations Committee with a favorable recommendation. The bill would subject the Colorado Public Employees’ Retirement Association (PERA) — for certain purposes — to public‑meeting posting and disclosure requirements similar to other local public bodies and would require specified financial and meeting materials to be posted online.
Sponsors and supporters described the bill as a governance and transparency measure that codifies processes PERA already uses in many cases, clarifies when the PERA board must post meeting materials, and establishes term limits for board members. Representative Lukens, a sponsor, said stakeholders including PERA, the Colorado Association of School Executives, the Colorado Association of School Boards, the Colorado Education Association, AARP and AFSCME engaged in the bill’s drafting and now support it.
“I rise today in strong support of Senate Bill 147,” Representative Garcia Sander said. “This is a common sense bipartisan measure that brings needed transparency, accessibility, and accountability to the Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association.”
Andrew Roth, CEO of Colorado PERA, testified that PERA supports the bill and that the legislation largely codifies practices PERA already follows. “PERA supports this bill and has been engaging constructively in the stake holding process,” Roth told the committee.
The bill requires PERA to post certain meeting notices, agendas and materials online (the sponsors and PERA said this will include three years of board meeting materials) and to provide specified financial disclosures. PERA’s testimony explained that posting the existing archive — estimated at roughly 15,000 pages — will create modest accessibility work for staff and incur minor costs to make records accessible; PERA said those costs (estimated in the fiscal note as roughly $10,000 to $25,000) will be paid from PERA’s operating fund generated from trust funds rather than from the state general fund.
The measure also adds PERA to the list of local public bodies for open‑meeting law purposes, specifies notice and financial posting requirements consistent with school‑district transparency laws, clarifies delegation of administrative authority, and limits PERA board members to two consecutive terms for the purposes of open‑meetings law.
Supporters said the bill improves access for retirees and current members who need clearer ways to find meeting documents and financial details. Janice Schloosner, chief financial officer for Douglas County School District, said local governments and school districts already publish similar materials and that PERA members deserve the same access. PERA testified that the organization worked with sponsors to refine the bill and that the requested documentation largely reflects information already produced.
The committee moved SB147 to Appropriations with a favorable recommendation; sponsors and witnesses said the bill will enhance transparency for members and retirees while using PERA resources to cover modest implementation costs.
