Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council reviews draft deed restrictions for Milford Corporate Center; debate over long-term city oversight
Summary
Council reviewed a draft declaration of covenants for the Milford Corporate Center, based on a development model used at the Pankajer corporate park, and discussed whether the city should retain long-term oversight or shift authority to a future homeowners association or property-owners'group.
Council reviewed a draft set of deed restrictions for the Milford Corporate Center and debated how long the city should retain oversight of common areas and architectural standards.
Planning director Rob Pierce presented a draft declaration of covenants modeled on language used at the Pankajer Corporate Center near Newark. Pierce said the draft covers permitted uses, nuisance and safety standards, parking and loading rules, hazardous-substance prohibitions and a process for an architectural-review committee. He said the draft aims to provide additional standards that go beyond the zoning code and to clarify maintenance responsibilities for common areas.
"One of the questions later on in the presentation is, how long does city council want to be involved in this development of this property?" Pierce asked council, explaining the city could retain oversight permanently (as it does for some existing city-managed business-park features) or limit involvement to an initial development period before turning rules over to the property owners.
Council members urged care in striking a balance between attracting tenants and preserving a high-quality campus appearance. One councilor said the corporate center is a visible area and argued the city should keep "a level of control and establish standards and for those standards to be maintained." Another council member said standards should not be so restrictive that potential tenants are discouraged.
Pierce suggested options including a short-term city role (up to a set percent of lots sold) or a longer-term role with a designated architectural-review committee; he asked whether council preferred the Planning Commission, staff or a committee of property owners and the developer to serve as the review body. Councilors also discussed responsibilities related to streets and entrance signage; staff said the city would be responsible for the streets and some entrance maintenance if the city retains those elements under municipal ownership.
The draft declaration and design guidance will be revised based on council feedback and legal review. No final adoption vote was taken; staff will work with the developer to refine the deed restrictions and return to council with a more detailed proposal.
