Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals Variance Guidance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Zoning board debates short-term rentals, self-created hardship standard; staff has no immediate update on city policy
Summary
Board members reviewed the four-factor test for use variances and discussed how short-term rentals interact with R1 zoning, expressing concerns about neighborhood character and enforcement; staff said no citywide update was available at the meeting.
Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals spent a substantive portion of the Jan. 27 meeting discussing short-term rentals and the “self-created hardship” question that arises in use-variance requests, without taking formal action.
Board members reviewed the established four-part test for use variances: the applicant’s inability to realize a reasonable return, uniqueness of the hardship, whether the variance would alter the essential character of the neighborhood, and whether the hardship is self-created. Codes staff explained that the R1 zoning district generally excludes short-term rentals and that short-term rental requests are therefore often presented as use or area variances.
Board members raised repeated concerns about neighborhood character, potential commercial conversion of residential blocks, and enforcement difficulties if a variance remains with the property after a subsequent transfer of ownership. One member summarized the practical risk: a use variance runs with the land, so a future owner could operate differently than the present resident. Another member emphasized that applicants should supply detailed financial documentation if they claim inability to realize a reasonable return.
City staff told the board that there was not an immediate update on a citywide policy for short-term rentals; the staff member said they would provide the board with any plan or guidance as it becomes available. Board members urged consistent application of the four factors and noted that the high legal bar for use variances is intentional to protect residential character.
No formal votes or policy changes were taken. The discussion was advisory and aimed at clarifying how the board should review future use-variance requests related to short-term rentals.
