Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Municipal Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

External auditors give Auburn a clean opinion for 2024 but flag internal-control and fund-balance issues

2757295 · February 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

External auditors presenting to the Auburn City Council said they expect to issue a clean (unmodified) opinion on the city's 2024 financial statements but reported a significant deficiency in internal control related to year-end adjustments and accrual reconciliations, noted restatements from 2023 and highlighted longer-term concerns about fund-b

External auditors told the Auburn City Council on Feb. 13 that they plan to issue a “clean, unmodified opinion for 2024” on the city’s financial statements but identified a significant deficiency in internal control and highlighted budgetary and long-term debt pressures the council should consider during the 2025–26 budget process.

Luke Malecki, the engagement partner for the audit firm, presented a summary of the fiscal-year 2024 audit for the year ended June 30, 2024. “That is a clean, unmodified opinion for 2024,” Malecki said, and added the firm had “gotten all the evidence that we needed” to finalize its reports. The auditors also delivered a report on internal control and said they would include a management letter recommending updates to policies and procedures, including journal-entry practices, capital-asset accounting, a debt policy and capital-project controls.

Malecki told the council that the city’s reported fund balance ended the year at about $10.1 million, including roughly $5.1 million held as a debt reserve. He said one-time transfers from the capital projects fund had inflated reported revenues for 2024 — a $5.1 million transfer into a debt reserve explained much of the apparent $5.1 million boost — and that, when isolated, revenues were effectively flat year over year. Total expenses rose to about $46.4 million in 2024, a roughly 5.3% increase from the prior year, driven largely by public-safety salaries and overtime.

Audit staff said the city has a long-term interfund balance related to public utilities that the auditors presented as a $2.3 million nonspendable general-fund balance because the money is not currently available for general-fund use. Malecki and manager Amy Hainsley also noted the city’s outstanding debt levels and recommended the council consider a formal fund-balance policy, a debt-management policy and longer-range capital planning. Malecki suggested those three policy tools would help avoid repeating situations where bond proceeds or capital funds are not timely spent.

The auditors identified restatements to prior-year net position and fund balance related to reevaluation activity and receivable adjustments; they also said a revolving loan was moved from a capital fund to its own special-revenue fund for clearer tracking. Malecki said the auditors expected to finalize and release the financial-statement audit within a week or two and that management’s responses and corrections were being finalized.

Councilors asked several procedural questions. Councilor Cuddy thanked the auditors for a thorough presentation and Malecki offered to share sample policies that other municipalities use. The auditors identified items they expect the city to address in the management letter; city staff indicated they would respond in writing as part of the audit closeout.