Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Works topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee hears bill to raise relocation reestablishment cap from $50,000 to $200,000 for displaced businesses and nonprofits

2755794 · March 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Substitute House Bill 1733 would raise the statutory cap on reestablishment reimbursements for businesses and nonprofits displaced by public projects from $50,000 to $200,000 and require annual inflation adjustments.

The Law & Justice Committee on March 24 held a public hearing on Substitute House Bill 1733, which would raise the cap on reestablishment reimbursements for people and organizations displaced by government acquisition from the current $50,000 to $200,000 and require the Washington State Department of Transportation to adjust the cap annually for inflation.

Mac Nicholson, representing the King County Council, testified that the existing $50,000 cap for reestablishment expenses (expenses such as property repairs, required improvements at a new site, signage, advertising and two years of certain utility/lease differentials) has not been updated in 22 years and is inadequate in dense urban markets. Nicholson said the acquiring agency should bear the cost of reestablishing a displaced business.

Jordan Crowley, owner of Alki Beach Academy, a West Seattle childcare center scheduled for displacement by a Sound Transit project, said the increased cap would better reflect replocation costs and help preserve community services such as childcare, arts education and groceries. Keith Edwards, owner of a chiropractic clinic in West Seattle, said his relocation estimate is approximately $500,000 and warned that insufficient reimbursement would push some businesses to bankruptcy.

Supporters argued the measure balances necessary public infrastructure development and equitable treatment for displaced businesses and nonprofits; opponents were not recorded in the hearing. The committee concluded the hearing with no immediate action.