Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Roofing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Court updates on courthouse roof and annex: leaning toward filling annex openings and seeking historic-grant eligibility
Summary
Commissioners discussed options for addressing water damage and historic restoration of the courthouse annex, including demolition to restore the 1912 façade or temporary in-filling and roof work, and took no formal action.
Clay County commissioners discussed the courthouse roof project and the condition of an attached annex, but took no formal action.
Commissioners said the annex—originally a surveyor's addition that later housed the sheriff's office and now used by the district clerk—does not match the 1912 courthouse and has significant water damage and mold concerns. The court discussed two paths: demolish the annex and restore the courthouse closer to its 1912 footprint (which could position the county for historic-commission grants) or install a new roof on the annex and "in-fill" the windows to make the annex watertight as a short-term fix.
Commissioners said they are having difficulty obtaining contractor bids for window and other remediation work tied to demolition and restoration; they do have a price to re-roof the annex but were waiting on prices for window restoration and other related work before choosing a final course. The historical commission would have to review restoration plans if the county pursued a full historic remodel and potential grant funding.
No vote or appropriation was taken; the court said the matter remains under study and no action was required at the meeting.
Ending: Court staff will continue to seek contractor pricing and report back; no action was approved at this meeting.
