Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Construction delays, playground relocations and accessibility questions surface on Lincoln school capital projects
Summary
Committee members reviewed progress and complications on multiple school capital projects, including building additions at Northern and Central, playground relocations tied to construction, drainage and parking issues at Salesville, and accessibility and sprinkler trade-offs that could affect costs.
Get email alerts on the School Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Members of the town committee reviewed the status of ongoing and planned capital projects at Lincoln schools at their Jan. 9 meeting. Officials reported active work at several sites, disruption from relocations and site constraints that could affect budgets and timelines.
The committee heard that construction is underway at Northern and other schools; temporary trailers remain in place and site work is ongoing. The district recently held a groundbreaking for additions and the contractor for the four schools is serving as general contractor with subcontractors handling concrete and building erection.
Several playgrounds must be relocated because additions or site moves changed available space. Committee members said the relocation at Grimsley Preschool and other sites has already triggered a roughly $13,000 expense at one preschool and that playground moves may be funded from either capital or operating lines depending on project accounting and the timing of transfers.
Salesville and other sites face drainage and access problems. Committee members flagged a trade-off at Salesville between installing a sprinkler system that would trigger different code requirements and replacing doors/windows and egress elements to meet accessibility and life-safety codes. The cost of making egress and accessibility changes could be substantial; committee members said the district is weighing a suspended sprinkler system or removing certain elements to reduce sprinkler scope.
Parking and site layout were discussed for Salesville and Woodland Court parking. Committee members and recreation representatives raised concerns that proposed parking changes could reduce open play space and affect fields; committee members suggested repaving and better marking of existing lots as lower-cost options.
Site utility work was also discussed. At central facilities a rooftop HVAC unit plan ran into alignment problems where structural columns and as-built drawings did not match, leading the committee to question whether the unit should be ground-mounted. The committee also noted potential gas-line work tied to changes (a move from smaller residential-size gas lines to a 4-inch feed could require welding and cost in the low six figures in some cases).
Security and technology capital needs were addressed: the schools previously requested infrastructure wiring and are now seeking camera upgrades to make systems compatible across facilities; committee members said some previously allotted funds had been used for infrastructure and this year's request focuses on camera compatibility and additional units where needed.
Committee members asked for clearer documentation of which capital costs are eligible for capital funding vs. operating transfers and requested updates on project timelines and costs when the construction managers provide revised flow charts.
