Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Community Organizations Facility Access topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Community groups urge commission to ease county building rental rules for nonprofits

2753054 · March 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

During public comment, Gary Moore and representatives of local nonprofits asked commissioners to reconsider a one-size-fits-all rental fee policy for county buildings that they say burdens small community organizations providing services to residents.

In public comment Appling County resident Gary Moore and representatives of community nonprofits urged commissioners to reconsider a “one-size-fits-all” rental fee and rule for county-owned buildings, saying the policy creates hardship for small groups that provide food, clothing and mentoring in underserved neighborhoods.

Moore described work by local nonprofits, including a group identified as Called Love and the local NAACP chapter, that provide summer feeding programs, a community Christmas event, mentoring inside schools and material assistance to elderly residents. He told commissioners that some groups were being charged $50 for meetings and $175 to rent a county building and asked the board to “give your organizations nonprofit a break” for legitimate community-serving groups.

Moore said the organizations do not ask the county for funding and that their volunteer work reduces complaints and service burdens on county staff. He urged commissioners to consider exceptions or flexibility for community organizations that operate year-round programs and to recognize their contributions publicly.

Why it matters: County facility rental and fee policies can affect small nonprofits’ ability to provide community services; public-comment requests ask the commission to weigh community benefit when enforcing rental rules.

Board response: Commissioners acknowledged the comments and asked staff to consider the concerns; no formal policy change was proposed or adopted at the meeting.