Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Development Regulations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Portsmouth planning board backs updated subdivision, land-development checklists to align with state law
Summary
The planning board voted to recommend that the town council adopt revised subdivision and land-development checklists and related attachment reorganizations to bring local forms and processes into compliance with state legislative changes introduced since 2023.
Portsmouth’s Planning Board voted to give a favorable advisory recommendation to the Town Council for a package of amendments that replace several existing application checklists with three consolidated checklists intended to align local forms with recent state law changes.
The board’s action covers reorganizing attachments 1–27 of the subdivision and land-development regulations, eliminating several old attachments (6, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 14), and adding three new checklists: a minor subdivision/minor land development checklist, a major subdivision/major land development checklist, and a development plan review checklist.
Why it matters: board members and staff said the change will streamline intake for applicants and ensure the town’s forms and procedures match statutory language recently amended at the state level. Planning staff said the consolidated checklists will let applicants mark the level of review they seek (pre-application, preliminary plan, final plan) and will replace long-standing, piecemeal attachment checklists in the regulations.
Planning Department staffer Miss Hitchin and consultant Jim Reardon of Weston & Sampson briefed the board. Reardon said the updates are part of a larger multi-tier rewrite; staff characterized this package as Tier 2 work, with a fuller rewrite (Tier 3) to follow. "If these changes are not made at the local level to respond to the state law, then the state law will override local regulations and ordinances without any local action," Reardon told the board.
Board members asked whether anything in the checklist updates was controversial. Miss Hitchin replied, "There's nothing controversial. A lot of this is just marrying up with what our new language says in the land development ordinance." No members of the public spoke on the item during the hearing.
Action: Member Mr. Tibbets moved to recommend approval to the Town Council; Mr. Harding seconded. The board voted in favor; the motion carried.
What happens next: Planning staff said the recommendation will go to the Town Council on March 24 for public hearing and possible adoption. The board and consultants said Tier 3 — a longer rewrite of the full zoning and subdivision code — will follow after Tier 2 adoption.
Ending note: Staff emphasized the changes are primarily administrative and intended to avoid a state-level override by updating local checklists and cross references to match statutory language.
