Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Renewable Energy Solar topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Trustees review several residential solar permit applications, flag map errors and emergency contact details
Summary
Contractors and homeowners presented multiple residential solar installations across Elmsford; trustees focused on aesthetics, correct addressing on vicinity maps and whether emergency contact information is posted on equipment.
Get email alerts on the Renewable Energy Solar topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
During the Jan. 14 work session the Board of Trustees reviewed multiple residential solar permit applications, including addresses noted in the packet as 27 North Everest Avenue, 18 North Mortimer, and 49 White Plains Avenue, among others.
Contractors and applicants described systems of varying sizes. Tara McDevitt of Trinity Forward spoke for one proposed 17‑module system; Michael LaRosa of Infiniti Solar Systems presented a proposal for 43 panels at 18 North Mortimer and multiple other applications. Applicants and trustees discussed panel placement and site access: trustees examined the renderings for front‑roof panels and suggested more symmetrical placement to improve appearance and, in one case, noted a front panel that appeared shaded.
Trustees and a contractor also identified errors and omissions in application materials. A contractor pointed out that a vicinity map listed a wrong or outdated address and requested correction. Trustee questions included whether installers post emergency‑response contact information on equipment; the contractor said warning labels are placed on panels but did not confirm an emergency contact number would be affixed. Trustees repeatedly asked if the items were "okay for the agenda," and the record shows multiple trustees signaled assent during the reviews, but the transcript does not record a separate formal roll‑call vote on each permit during the work session.
No additional conditions or formal permit decisions are recorded in the meeting transcript; applicants were told they were "all set" in several instances and reminded to follow submission requirements.

