Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Taxes Capital Gains topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Missouri Senate debates repeal of capital gains tax; measure laid over after hours of questioning
Summary
Senators debated a bill to repeal the way Missouri taxes capital gains, with supporters arguing it would spur investment and opponents warning of large revenue losses. After sustained questioning and fiscal concerns, the measure was laid over on the informal calendar.
The Missouri Senate spent hours March 11 debating a proposal to repeal the state''s treatment of capital gains on individual and corporate income, but senators ultimately laid the measure over for further consideration.
Senator from the twentieth sponsored House committee substitute for House Bill 594 and 508, saying the measure "would repeal Missouri's capital gains tax," and arguing the change would spur investment and raise wages by lowering the cost of capital. He told colleagues the fiscal note could not capture the bill''s full dynamic effects: "The money that we send back to Missourians won't disappear. Some of it will be spent, some invested," he said in floor remarks (Senator from the twentieth).
Opponents pressed the sponsor on the structure and effect of the change, saying Missouri currently taxes capital gains by treating them as ordinary income and that the bill would shift revenue responsibility to the state''s general fund. Senators including the senator from the first, the senator from the nineteenth and the senator from the eighth questioned whether the measure would amount to an unsubsidized handout to wealthy taxpayers and corporations and whether it would jeopardize funding for education and other state services.
Senators repeatedly cited the bill's fiscal note during debate. The estimate most often referenced by speakers showed a potential general revenue impact in the first year of roughly $334 million, with continuing effects in the hundreds of millions in subsequent years. Senators also noted a larger context of prior tax cuts and triggers that reduce general revenue and the state's longstanding concern about underfunding school foundation formulas.
The sponsor and backers argued the repeal would eliminate taxation of inflationary gains and reduce the ''lock-in'' effect that discourages transactions; critics pointed to data cited on the floor showing a substantial share of capital gains accruing to a small number of high-income taxpayers. Several senators called for a broader, deliberative study of tax policy before adopting a change of this magnitude.
After extended questioning and debate, a senator moved the bill be placed on the informal calendar. The motion to lay the bill over was adopted.
The debate highlighted the tension in Missouri fiscal policymaking between tax reductions advocates and senators concerned about the persistence of funding for core services such as K-12 education and public safety.
