Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Fees And Licensing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Shelby council removes plan-review application fee in health-fees ordinance after discussion

2743685 · March 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Shelby City Council voted to remove the plan-review application fee from the city code’s health division fees (listed in the ordinance under review) after council members and staff said the fee was not necessary; the ordinance passed third reading with a roll-call vote.

The Shelby City Council voted to amend city fee rules by removing the plan-review application fee from the municipal health-division fee schedule and approved the ordinance on third reading.

Council members debated the size and structure of plan-review fees earlier in the meeting while reviewing changes to Chapter 276 (Division of Health) that include licensing and approval fees for food-service and body-art businesses. Councilmember Martin proposed treating smaller construction projects differently—suggesting projects under $100,000 receive a reduced or waived plan-review fee and larger projects pay a higher bracket—while Councilmember Oz and others discussed sample figures (one suggestion floated was $50 for small projects and $150 for larger ones).

City staff representative (Ms. Olsen) was not present at the meeting; the council reported that Olsen, when contacted, said removing the plan-review application fee would not be problematic. With that guidance, Councilmember Martin moved to amend the ordinance by striking the plan-review application (subsection 5) and renumbering subsequent subsections. Councilmember Roberts seconded the amendment. The motion to amend passed on a roll call; later the ordinance on third reading (identified in the record as Order/Ordinance 29, 2024) passed its third reading.

The council did not adopt a final, tiered numerical schedule for future plan-review fees at this meeting; members said they want additional information about the workload and review costs before setting exact dollar amounts and that they could revisit fee levels after a period of implementation and review.

The amendment deletes the plan-review application item from the fee schedule (the transcript identifies the provision as subsection 5 of section 276.10) and instructs staff to renumber remaining subsections. No effective-date language for the fee removal was specified on the record.

Council members present who participated in the votes included Councilmember Martin and Councilmember Roberts; the roll call recorded additional yes votes from members identified in the record. The council indicated staff would provide follow-up information about review cost burdens and suggested bringing a more detailed fee schedule back to a future meeting for consideration.