Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Healthcare Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee hears bill to make Montana reinsurance statutory appropriation, members ask questions about fund volatility

2742578 · March 21, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

House Bill 281 would convert the state assessment portion of the Montana Reinsurance Program into a statutory appropriation so the auditor’s office could request additional authority when federal and state reinsurance funding fluctuates.

Representative Ken Walsh opened House Bill 281 as a proposal from the state auditor’s office to change the Montana Reinsurance Program’s funding mechanism to a statutory appropriation so the auditor can request additional spending authority via the budget change document process when federal grant awards and state assessments fluctuate.

Walsh said the reinsurance program — established under a federal waiver and Montana statute after 2019 — has helped lower individual market premiums roughly 9–10 percent and that volatility in funding caused a shortfall in fiscal year 2024 that required a fiscal transfer and a supplemental request in HB3. Amber Thorvaldson, chief financial officer for the state auditor’s office, testified as a proponent and explained that the program receives a 1.2% assessment on carrier premiums (a state assessment that varies with premium levels) and an annual federal grant amount; both sources can fluctuate from year to year.

Committee members pressed the auditor’s office about the fiscal note chart and whether the 1.2% assessment is a reliable revenue source. Thorvaldson said the assessment is set in statute but the amount collected can vary and is difficult to estimate precisely; actuarial work and a reinsurance board set annual reimbursement levels based on available federal and state funds.

Legislative staff walked the committee through statutory-appropriation guidelines under 17-1-1508 (discussed in committee) and cautioned that “yes/no” boxes on fiscal notes reflect different guidance (in this case, a “no” can indicate appropriateness for statutory appropriation). Senators discussed predictability, carryover federal funds, and how statutory appropriation could affect budgeting. The chair later noted the committee would hold HB281 for a short time so Senator McGillivray could ask additional questions; the transcript records that the bill was held for follow-up.