Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the K6 Core Ela Selection topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ogden board delays K–6 core ELA selection after close committee split between Amplify and EL Education/OpenUp
Summary
Board members and teachers debated a close committee recommendation on K–6 core English-language-arts materials; staff presented three costed options and recommended choosing one knowledge-based curriculum for K–6 to preserve vertical alignment. Final action was deferred to the April 17 meeting.
Board discussion over K–6 core English-language-arts (ELA) materials at the Ogden City School District’s March meeting ended without a final vote after staff and curriculum committees returned nearly tied scores for two knowledge-building options: Amplify CKLA (third edition) and Open Up/EL Education (published by OpenUp).
District staff reconvened teacher committees after receiving updated copyrights and final vendor fee proposals; those committees again recommended materials but returned closely matched scores. In K–2 the committee favored Amplify narrowly; in grades 3–6 the committee favored EL Education by a small margin. Staff advised the board that adopting two different knowledge-based programs for adjacent grade spans could create transition and training challenges for teachers and students.
Administration presented three costed options for K–6 implementation over a seven‑year period: adopt Amplify for K–6 (option 1), adopt Open Up/EL Education for K–6 (option 2), or adopt a split (Amplify for K–2 and Open Up for 3–6) matching the committee split (option 3). Representative figures provided in the meeting were: Amplify materials at about $795,000 (7-year, all-inclusive materials cost), EL Education (Open Up) materials about $1.124 million (7-year, all-inclusive), and combined totals for the larger adoption-and-training packages ranging from roughly $1.7 million (Amplify all K–6) to $2.1 million (Open Up all K–6); the split option was presented at about $2.0 million. Staff also outlined vendor training approaches and a district “train-the-trainer” plan intended to reduce long-term vendor dependence.
Teachers and committee members who attended the meeting urged adoption of a single curriculum for K–6 to preserve vertical alignment and minimize burdens on instructional coaches. Theresa MacInnes and other committee members said EL Education’s unit structure integrates science and social studies content with scaffolded language supports useful for multilingual learners, while several classroom teachers, including Holly Bailey and Natalie Dussol, said Amplify felt more accessible in third grade and easier for teachers to implement in classrooms with varied needs.
Board members asked detailed questions about fee proposals and implementation costs. Vice President Anderson noted the close committee recommendations and emphasized following the committee experts. Business administrator Zane and other board members discussed whether the roughly $400,000 difference between some options would be better used elsewhere in the budget; staff said the higher or lower up-front costs are one-time, seven-year licensing numbers and suggested those savings could be redirected but urged the board to weigh teacher and student readiness as the central factor.
Given the tight scoring, differing practical strengths and the financial trade-offs, the board directed staff to return with final recommendation materials and formal action at the April 17 board meeting.
The March discussion included public comment from teachers and committee members who participated in the adoption process; staff said the reconvened committees performed an additional evidence-based review after new vendor copyright packages were released.
