Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Library Materials topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board upholds most committee recommendations on challenged books, moves one middle‑school title to high school
Summary
The board voted on several challenged library titles: The Kite Runner and November 9 were retained, Sold failed to be retained, and Carnival at Bray was moved from middle school to high school with restrictions. Trustees debated the review process and librarians—apacity to read new titles before they are released.
Get email alerts on the Library Materials topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The board heard a lengthy discussion about challenged library materials and approved most of the committee recommendations to retain titles, with one book removed from middle‑school availability.
During debate, a board member said she believed some titles were not age appropriate for minors and expressed concern about explicit sexual content described in committee comments. "I do not believe this material is age appropriate for minor children or for us to be supplying to minor children," a trustee said of one title during the discussion. Another board member described the library review process and said local librarians choose and manage holdings as professionals. "These are options for students to choose. This is not mandated reading for anybody," a board member said in defense of retention decisions.
Roll calls followed committee recommendations. The board retained The Kite Runner and November 9 by 4–3 votes, did not retain Sold after a 3–4 vote, and retained Carnival at Bray with restrictions (move to high school) 4–3. Administration and committee members described the review process: library staff said they use selection criteria and that many titles are classified by libraries as "adult fiction" or "young adult fiction," but speakers noted the district efinition of "young adult" covers ages 12–18.
Trustees debated process issues as well: some members suggested waiting to order books until final published copies are available for review, and others urged better staffing or resources for librarians who review materials. The board voted on each challenged title according to committee recommendations and recorded roll‑call votes for the contested items.

