Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Boundary Line Adjustment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident seeks boundary-line adjustment at Carpenter Park; board advises easement or limited survey and possible waivers
Summary
A resident asked the Plymouth Planning Board for procedural guidance March 20 about a limited boundary‑line adjustment near Carpenter Trailer Park to preserve pasture access; the board recommended filing a boundary‑line adjustment application but noted waivers for full-property resurvey are often possible in small transfers.
Get email alerts on the Boundary Line Adjustment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A Plymouth resident requested guidance March 20 about a potential boundary-line adjustment that would transfer a narrow “finger” of land from a neighboring parcel (Carpenter Trailer Park) to the resident’s property to preserve pasture access for horses.
The board advised the resident that a formal boundary-line adjustment application to the planning board is the appropriate procedural route. Joseph, the town planner, said the registry of deeds frequently requires a stamped plan showing the parcel portion being transferred; however, the planning board historically has granted waivers for full resurvey of large multi‑lot properties when a small, clearly agreed‑upon portion of land is involved. The board suggested the applicant request waivers for surveying requirements to limit cost and said staff can identify which specific waivers are customary.
Board members said an easement could also be an appropriate tool if the family prefers to preserve access to pasture without changing lot ownership. The resident was advised that both parties (the donor owner and the recipient) would need to sign the boundary‑line adjustment paperwork and that town staff can clarify registry recording requirements.
Because the parcel area contains wetlands and limited usable area, board members said a full development application or road construction would be unlikely or impractical; they indicated the change appears straightforward but recommended the resident return with a boundary‑line adjustment application and any requested waivers. The board emphasized it could not provide legal advice but could advise on procedural options and typical documentary requirements.
The resident indicated he would confer with the landowner and proceed with either an easement or a boundary‑line application as advised.

