Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Urban Forest Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council advances first reading of tree ordinance after debate over creating advisory tree board
Summary
Council advanced a proposed 'Trees' ordinance to a second reading, directing further review after discussion about whether to create a permanent advisory board and how much authority it should have; vote to advance was 5–0.
On March 25 the East Greenwich Town Council advanced a proposed municipal tree ordinance (to add a new Chapter 240, "Trees") to a second reading after a lengthy discussion about the ordinance’s scope and whether it should create a five‑member advisory tree board.
The draft ordinance would codify the duties of the tree warden (a position required by state law), set procedures for notice and appeals when the town proposes removal of a public tree, and establish a local advisory body to advise the town on tree‑management issues. Solicitor Peter said much of the ordinance fleshes out existing state statute governing tree wardens and public‑tree jurisdiction: “This ordinance basically just kind of fills out some of the details,” Peter said.
Points debated: Council members and staff discussed several recurring issues: - Scope: several councilors and staff emphasized the draft applies to public trees (rights‑of‑way, parks) and does not create new authority to regulate private‑property tree removal except where a private tree threatens public land or safety. - Advisory body: the draft calls for a five‑member advisory tree board with staggered three‑year terms appointed by the council. Supporters — including councilors and town staff — said a formal board would help secure grants and support a "Tree City" designation. Critics cautioned that creating another appointed body risks creating expectations for funding and work the town may not sustain and that the existing volunteer tree council already performs much of the advisory role. - Costs and staffing: Town Manager Andy Tites and staff explained routine maintenance and annual bronze/statue‑style upkeep were modest in the monument conversation; for the tree ordinance they acknowledged that town tree work already uses significant staff time and equipment. Andy said the ordinance could help organize annual plans, pursue grants, and set expectations but warned about managing public expectations regarding budgets and staffing.
Outcome: After public comment and internal discussion the council voted to advance the draft ordinance to a second reading and a public hearing so the council and public can review refined language. The motion to advance passed 5–0. Council members directed staff and the solicitor to refine language related to the advisory body’s scope and to return with suggested edits before the second reading.
