Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Saxonville Jacksonville topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Subcommittee discusses Saxonville and Jacksonville redevelopment, new ownership and infrastructure needs
Summary
City staff and councilors discussed recent sales and redevelopment interest in Saxonville and Jacksonville, potential zoning options (special permit/incentive zoning), and a multi‑million dollar intersection reconstruction that the city will seek state funding to cover.
Framingham City staff and councilors discussed redevelopment plans and zoning options for Saxonville and Jacksonville, noting recent property sales, rooftop solar lease complications, and a need for major intersection improvements to support village‑scale redevelopment.
During public comment, Adam Bloomfield raised broader concerns about state zoning changes and local impact. Sarki, the city’s economic development director, told the subcommittee that Saxonville was recently sold and that rooftop solar leases could affect near‑term redevelopment plans: “there's been interest to see that property redeveloped, and I guess the leases or what have you with the solar, kinda control what can happen, you know, in the near future.” He said he planned to meet the new owner to discuss long‑range plans.
Sarki estimated the cost to rebuild the principal Saxonville intersection at more than $10,000,000 and urged the subcommittee to pursue state grant programs such as MassWorks and to coordinate zoning to strengthen grant applications. He cited an earlier example in Nobscot where rezoning helped secure a $3,200,000 grant tied to multiple redevelopment projects.
Councilors and staff discussed using incentive zoning by special permit rather than by‑right zoning so the city retains discretionary review—allowing conditions or denial—if redevelopment proposals are submitted. Councilor Long and others emphasized that neighborhood engagement will be key: councilor Ward said the subcommittee plans a series of community meetings in Jacksonville, beginning the next day, to solicit broad input.
Councilors noted Pine Field Plaza and the former State Lumber site as priority parcels for zoning and redevelopment conversations. Multiple councilors warned the subcommittee not to wait until an owner pursues a zoning board of appeals route (use variance) that could bypass the city’s preferred rezoning process.
Why it matters: Large infrastructure costs and the choice between by‑right versus special permit zoning will shape whether redevelopment preserves village scale and how the city competes for state grants. Several councilors said earlier neighborhood pushback on by‑right MBTA zoning shows the importance of outreach and conceptual design in advance of any project approvals.
No zoning changes were adopted at the meeting; staff will pursue outreach and follow‑up meetings with property owners and neighbors.
