Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Micromobility Regulation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee concurs with House Bill 588 after three amendments to regulate motorized scooters

2732639 · March 21, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Senate Transportation Committee concurred with House Bill 588, which defines motorized scooters and sets regulations including allowable rear-facing lights and raising a rider age consideration to 18; the bill was amended three times on the record and passed.

The Senate Transportation Committee concurred with House Bill 588, a bill that defines motorized scooters and provides state-level regulations for their use, after approving three amendments on the record.

Committee staff told members the bill revises transportation laws to define "motorized scooter," provide regulations for those devices and amend related sections. Representative Durham sponsored the bill in the House; committee staff and members reported the sponsor had approved three amendments and called them "friendly." One amendment (identified on the record as a technical coordination clause) corrects statutory coordination with a bill previously passed from the committee.

Senator Fern described an amendment clarifying allowable lighting when a device has no place to attach a fixed rear light, saying a rider may use a red lamp "affixed to the rider and facing the rear" and that such a device could be helmet-mounted. The sponsor was also reported to have been interested in ensuring the new category covered riders up to 18 years of age. Committee members amended the bill three times (amendment identifiers on the record: .001, .002, .003 variants), then moved to concur in the bill as three times amended. The concurrence passed by voice and proxy votes; the committee announced passage.

The record shows multiple aye-by-proxy votes recorded for members who were absent. Committee debate described the technical amendment and the rider-lighting and age clarifications; no further substantive policy conditions or follow-up assignments were recorded.