Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning And Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission weighs adding council appointee, board of zoning appeals to planning commission structure
Summary
Commission staff reported findings from nearby jurisdictions on planning-and-zoning commission size, appointment methods and use of a separate board of zoning appeals; commissioners discussed whether Canal Winchester should add council-appointed members and a BZA and debated workload and appeal frequency.
Charter review commissioners reviewed how nearby Central Ohio cities organize planning and zoning and whether Canal Winchester should revise its commission structure or create a separate board of zoning appeals (BZA).
Staff reported on research into Pickerington, Groveport, Reynoldsburg and Obetz and told commissioners that two of the four municipalities use five-member planning commissions, one uses a seven-member commission, and one did not specify size. Staff said two of the four meet monthly, three reported having a separate board of zoning appeals, and most appoint members by mayoral nomination with council confirmation.
Why it matters: the commission’s decisions would affect who reviews development applications and how appeals from planning decisions are heard. Commissioners noted that Canal Winchester’s current code lists many duties for the planning and zoning commission and asked whether separating appeals to a BZA would reduce council workload and improve clarity.
Discussion highlights: - Composition: Commissioners voiced support for a mixed appointment model under which the mayor would appoint several members and council would nominate or confirm additional members; one suggested model discussed at the meeting called for three mayoral appointees, three council appointees and one council member serving on the commission to reach seven total. - Appeals and quasi-judicial concerns: Commissioners raised the traditional advice that council members should be neutral because council acts as a quasi-judicial appellate body; staff said cities that have council members on P&Z generally separate the roles so a council member who participates at the P&Z level can step back during council’s appellate review because the standard of review differs. - Workload and frequency: Staff noted Canal Winchester has had few appeals in recent years — “probably had five appeals in the last 10 years,” a staff comment recorded during the meeting — and commissioners said P&Z meetings are often short but vary with development activity.
Next steps: staff offered to gather more specific code language from peer cities and return with options and suggested redlines. The commission did not adopt a final change to the charter at the meeting.
