Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Accessibility topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City engineer outlines why two curb ramps aren’t always feasible in retrofits; cost and utility conflicts cited
Summary
City staff reviewed ADA standards and explained common retrofit constraints — catch basins, traffic signal junction boxes, utility conduits, hydrants and topography — that can make installing two perpendicular curb ramps at every corner impractical or vastly more expensive.
City engineering staff reviewed ADA curb‑ramp design standards and the practical constraints that affect retrofit projects, emphasizing federal requirements and local design priorities.
Dan Buller (presentation attributed in the meeting) summarized the city’s design standards: new construction and reconstruction projects generally use two perpendicular curb ramps per corner, aligned with the crosswalk, while retrofit and preservation projects are prioritized differently and include exceptions. Buller explained that some elements of curb‑ramp design are non‑negotiable under federal ADA rules (for example, a maximum ramp slope of 8.3 percent, a 4‑foot landing and 4‑foot minimum ramp width), while other details are desirable but not required.
Staff showed examples where utility conflicts drive cost and complexity: moving a catch basin can cost tens of thousands of dollars; changing signal conduit or relocating a traffic signal junction box can require full traffic control and cost in the hundreds of thousands for a single corner; trees, hydrants and narrow sidewalk widths can also limit ramp placement. Buller gave an illustrative per‑ramp cost of roughly $10,000–$12,000 for typical retrofit ramps and said a full signal relocation can reach higher amounts, depending on site conditions.
The presentation stressed that ADA compliance is required, but ADA compliance does not always equate to full accessibility in every real‑world circumstance; engineers must balance legal requirements, pedestrian alignment, sight lines and the high cost of moving underground or signal infrastructure when selecting ramp configurations for retrofit projects.
No formal action was requested or taken; staff offered to continue site‑level coordination and engage further with council members and neighborhood stakeholders on specific problem corners.
