Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sunshine Quasi Judicial topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board receives refresher on Florida open‑meetings and quasi‑judicial rules
Summary
Board members heard a staff presentation covering Florida’s sunshine law, public‑records obligations under chapter 119, and the city’s quasi‑judicial procedures including the eight case types in city code section 155.
The City of Pembroke Pines Planning and Zoning Board received a legal briefing on Florida’s open‑meetings and public‑records rules and on the conduct required in quasi‑judicial hearings.
The presentation, given by a staff member, summarized the principal prohibitions of the sunshine law and the state’s public‑records statutes, chapter 119. The presenter said, “when it comes to sunshine law, that's the main prohibition for you that you have to be considerate of on a day to day basis,” and warned members to avoid direct or indirect private communications about matters that could foreseeably come before the board.
The staff member outlined key public‑records obligations and noted that written communications about official business—emails, text messages or social media posts—are likely records that the city clerk or the member must produce when requested. “If it's something that existed and you have in your possession, then that's a record that you then would be tasked with submitting to the city clerk,” the presenter said.
On quasi‑judicial procedure the presenter cited the Florida Supreme Court’s standards used to determine whether an item is quasi‑judicial in nature and said the city has codified the framework in section 155 of the city code. The presenter listed the eight types the code treats as quasi‑judicial, including site‑specific zoning changes, variances, plat approvals, special exceptions, code interpretations and appeals of planning and zoning decisions; and added that applicants are entitled to a formal hearing process when those matters are at issue.
Board members were reminded that decisions on quasi‑judicial items must be supported by “competent substantial evidence” in the record. The presenter urged members to rely on staff reports, testimony and documented facts when making findings of fact and law. The presentation ended with an offer for one‑on‑one follow up: the staff member encouraged members to reach out by email or phone for advice on specific questions.
Board members asked procedural questions during and after the briefing; no formal action was taken on the training itself.
