Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Variance Approval topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves restoration and modest expansion of International Inn, grants variances including transformer location

2729521 · March 21, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Historic Preservation Board on July 11 approved restoration and modest expansion of the International Inn, and granted five variances including contested approval to site an FP&L transformer pad near the front setback.

The Historic Preservation Board on July 11 approved renovation and restoration plans for the International Inn (301 Normandy Drive) and also approved five variances requested by the owner to support the renovation, including a contested proposal to place an FP&L transformer pad near the property's front setback.

Staff praised the owner's cooperation during the designation process and recommended approval of the restoration and modest 150-square-foot kitchen addition, a new pool and site improvements. Staff supported three of the variances (drive aisle reduction and two variances tied to the small addition) but recommended denial of two variances related to the location of the FP&L transformer, citing an alternative conforming location shown on the plans.

Architect Jamie (studio name given) and owner representative Ricky described plans to restore the historic lobby, replace windows and doors, install an elevator, raise the pool deck and improve landscaping. Jamie said the project would keep the hotel's historic character while upgrading life-safety elements and accessibility.

The contractor and architect explained that locating the transformer at the preferred front-setback location would allow better screening, easier FP&L access for maintenance and avoid a tight maneuvering condition in the parking court. Staff replied that the alternative location behind the building would meet code and avoid variances; the board discussed both positions at length.

On the variances, the board voted 5-1 to approve the requested variances (one No vote from Commissioner Reid); the certificate of appropriateness passed on a separate roll-call vote with unanimous support.

Votes at a glance: five variances approved by vote (yes:5, no:1); certificate of appropriateness approved by unanimous vote.