Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Bond Campaign topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board outlines outreach, clarifies ‘0 tax rate increase’ message for improvement bond vote
Summary
Superintendent and trustees described the May 6 bond election (no tax‑rate increase), outreach plans, intended projects and messaging to counter misinformation; trustees authorized an education campaign but no formal board action at the March 10 work session.
Superintendent Dr. Carter and district staff updated trustees on the proposed BCPS Improvement Bond campaign and outreach ahead of the May 6 ballot during the March 10 work session.
The district described the measure as a bond that would be presented to voters on May 6 with no tax‑rate increase; absentee ballots become available beginning March 27. Dr. Carter and staff asked trustees to serve as ambassadors to civil, faith‑based and business networks, and the district said it will provide flyers, yard signs and information boards to every school to help counter misinformation that the bond is a new tax.
Why it matters: the bond would fund campus and building improvements, security systems (including integrated vape detectors tied to cameras and the district’s safety system), roofing, stadium restoration and playground upgrades in buildings that district staff said have an average age near 75 years. Staff said tobacco‑settlement funds previously earmarked for detectors will be coupled with bond funds but that the tobacco money alone was insufficient to implement the system districtwide.
Details and outreach: staff reported they had received a sample ballot and were in an “education phase” of the campaign; they described 200 yard signs and large information boards planned for placement in schools. The district emphasized the message “0 tax rate increase” as the primary outreach line while noting legal limits on how the district may express support for ballot issues; trustees discussed grassroots ambassador networks and targeted outreach to parent and community organizations.
Security and operations: district staff described a site visit to Plymouth‑Canton where detectors triggered an alert that allowed SROs to respond; staff emphasized the need for administrator training and policy language around detector use, privacy and response protocols.
Board action: no formal vote on the bond occurred during the session; trustees supported an education campaign and asked staff to continue community outreach and messaging.
