Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solar Permitting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee adopts amendment, narrows solar-permitting mandate and advances bill after months of negotiations
Summary
After extensive testimony from counties, cities, building officials and solar supporters, the House Finance Committee adopted amendment L006 to remove the bill's mandated automated permitting requirement and extended grant timelines, then voted 9–4 to advance the narrowed bill (HB 10 96) to the committee of the whole.
House Bill 10 96 — originally drafted to require automated residential solar permitting in specified jurisdictions — was the subject of hours of testimony in the House Finance Committee. Local governments, building officials and county commissioners raised concerns about unfunded implementation costs, integration with existing permitting and financial systems, zoning and site-specific safety issues, and virtual inspection limitations.
Opponents including county commissioners and municipal building officials testified the bill, as introduced, would impose an unfunded mandate, risk site-specific safety oversights (wind load, snow load, septic systems, zoning setbacks) and require costly IT integrations that many local governments could not absorb. Several speakers, including Summit County Commissioner Tamara Pogue (Counties and Commissioners Acting Together), Arapahoe County Public Works Director Brian Weimer, the Colorado Municipal League, and multiple city and county building officials, said their existing permitting processes already produce timely approvals in most cases and that the vendor platform discussed (SolarAPP+) did not handle all local requirements.
Supporters — including solar contractors and statewide climate and consumer groups, the SolarAPP+ Foundation and jurisdictions that have piloted automated permitting — testified automated permitting can cut wait times, reduce cancellations and lower soft costs. Supporters pointed to pilot results and out-of-state experience and urged a statewide standard to reduce time and cost.
At the sponsors' request, the committee considered and adopted amendment L006. The adopted amendment removed the bill's original requirement for automated permitting in the specified jurisdictions and instead extended timelines in the existing, voluntary grant program (created previously) so jurisdictions awarded grants would have more time to implement automated tools if they choose. Legislative staff confirmed adoption of L006 removed the appropriation shown in the committee fiscal note and allowed the bill to be routed to the committee of the whole rather than Appropriations.
After adoption of L006, Representative Brown moved the amended bill to the committee of the whole; the committee voted 9–4 to advance HB 10 96 as amended. Sponsors said they will continue stakeholder discussions over the interim to craft a durable, workable approach for broader automated permitting adoption.
