Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Policies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Colchester School Board approves final reading of search-and-seizure policy F4; begins multi-step revision of ATOD policy F9
Summary
The board approved the second and final reading of the district’s search-and-seizure policy (F4) and completed a first reading of the Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Use policy (F9), directing further revisions including student leadership input and consultations with support programs.
The Colchester School Board on Feb. 18 approved the second and final reading of the district’s search-and-seizure policy (policy F4) and opened a revision process for the Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Use policy (policy F9), which the board will return to for further review.
During a brief discussion the board clarified that the F4 update adds language tying student refusal to cooperate with searches to existing “obstructing an investigation” consequences in the district’s Student Conduct and Discipline policy (F1). Board members said attorneys reviewed wording and that linking the policies improves consistency across procedures.
Chair Lindsay Cox explained the change in F4: "students who refuse to cooperate with this policy will be deemed to be obstructing an investigation and shall be subject to further disciplinary consequences per the student conduct and discipline policy F1." Cox said the consequence of "obstructing an investigation" already is described in the discipline procedures for school buildings and the cross-reference simply clarifies application.
The motion to approve the second and final reading of policy F4 was moved and approved during the meeting (motion text recorded in the minutes). The board did not record individual roll-call votes on the record; the motion carried after the board voice vote in favor.
On policy F9 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Use), administrators said the policy — last formally reviewed in February 2012 — is longer than the Vermont School Boards Association (VSBA) model and that the district intends to use a three-reading revision process. Amy Minor, superintendent, said the administration will convene student leadership groups (including student government, the Social Justice Alliance, athletic council, Gay–Straight Alliance and existing student-support programs) to compare the district’s existing policy and procedures with the VSBA model and to recommend edits.
Minor described a dual emphasis in the draft: layered disciplinary consequences in procedures (first, second, third-offense guidance) and stronger explicit therapeutic or supportive measures for students who may struggle with substance use. She said the district currently uses two school-based programs, Checkpoint and Changes, supported through a student-assistance grant to provide substance-abuse counseling and family outreach; administrators said specialists from those programs will be involved in reviewing the procedures for supportive measures.
The board approved the first reading of policy F9 and directed the administration to return with a draft of recommended changes at the second reading before broader public comment. Board members suggested the revision team separate policy language from operational procedure, reduce redundancy, and include middle-school stakeholder engagement as revisions are drafted. The board did not adopt final language at this meeting.
