Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Noise topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council discusses revisions to nuisance ordinance on barking dogs; police recommend narrowing enforcement language
Summary
City staff and the police chief reviewed proposed changes to the nuisance ordinance covering barking dogs. The police chief asked to remove provisions requiring lengthy continuous observation and recommended simpler complaint and direct‑observation standards and graduated fines.
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Noise topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The council discussed proposed revisions to the city’s noise nuisance ordinance aimed at clarifying the standard for excessive dog barking and easing enforcement for the police department.
Discussion points: Staff circulated draft language that defined nuisance barking by duration and frequency (examples included a 10‑minute continuous threshold and episodes totaling 30 minutes within a 3‑hour period). Police Chief Shirk advised removing the longer, episodic threshold because it would require officers to spend extended time observing a property; he recommended a standard based on complaints from two separate households or direct observation by an officer. The chief also proposed an initial fine of $50, subsequent fines at $100 and court citation on a third offense.
Why it matters: Council members noted enforcement must be practical for patrol staff and not rely on unrealistic observation burdens. Members suggested striking subjective language (for example, “excessive”) in favor of concrete wording (continuous or repetitive barking and direct observation) so enforcement and appeals are clearer.
Next steps: City staff will draft a revised ordinance that retains achievable enforcement criteria — removing the episodic 30‑minute threshold and adding direct observation language and a two‑complaint standard — and will provide a side‑by‑side version showing old and new text for the council’s first reading at a future meeting.
Ending: No ordinance was adopted at this meeting; staff will return with a revised draft and the old ordinance for comparison at the next meeting.

