Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tribal Jurisdiction topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bill would make state laws presumptively inapplicable to tribal lands unless the law says otherwise
Summary
Senate Bill 61, supported by both Ute nations and La Plata County after negotiated amendments, would direct courts to presume state statutes do not apply on tribal lands unless the statute explicitly references the tribe or its land. Advocates said the change reduces recurring jurisdictional conflicts and the need for case-by-case carve-outs.
Senate Bill 61 passed the Senate Judiciary Committee on March 7 with unanimous support after sponsors and tribal leaders negotiated clarifying amendments.
Sponsor Senator Simpson said the measure creates a rule of statutory construction: when the state passes a law that purports to apply statewide, courts should presume it does not apply to a tribe or tribal entities on tribal lands unless the statute explicitly mentions the tribe or tribal land. "The rule says that when the state passes a law that purports to apply to all actors in all lands statewide, that law would be presumed not to apply to the tribe or our tribally controlled entities operating on our tribal lands, unless the law expressly mentions the tribe or its lands," Vice Chairman Pinnacus testified on behalf of the Southern Ute Tribe.
Pinnacus and Senator Simpson said the change merely preserves existing jurisdictional boundaries under federal Indian law; it does not alter criminal jurisdiction or expand sovereign immunity. The Southern Ute Tribe outlined that tribal government and federal law already regulate many reservation matters and said the statutory presumption would reduce the need to negotiate individual statutory carve-outs for dozens of bills every session.
Senator Simpson said the bill was drafted with input from La Plata County and the two tribes and that amendments (L1 and L2) clarified the text, narrowed the rule’s application where appropriate and incorporated agreed drafting points. La Plata County representatives worked with tribal counsel to find language both sides could accept, the sponsor said.
The committee adopted the agreed amendments and voted 7–0 to advance the bill. Sponsor and tribal representatives asked that the bill be placed on the consent calendar for floor consideration.
Votes at a glance: Senate Bill 61 — advanced from committee 7–0 (committee vote recorded on March 7).
