Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Art Mural topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oviedo arts board tables planned Central Lake Park mural pending price and materials review
Summary
The Oviedo Public Arts Board discussed a proposed call to artists for a mural on a City property at Central Lake Park, debated budget and material standards, and voted to table the item for further research on comparable prices, materials, and selection criteria.
The Oviedo Public Arts Board on an unspecified date discussed a proposed call to artists for a new mural at Central Lake Park but voted to table the proposal while staff compiles price comparables and material guidelines.
Board staff member Wanda said the wall proposed for the mural measures about 8 feet by 13 feet and recommended a theme tied to the city’s centennial — “past, present and future.” Wanda proposed $15,000 for artist design and execution plus up to $5,000 for equipment and materials, and she asked the board whether the panel should require experienced muralists or accept applicants more broadly.
The board debated durability and maintenance: members noted that UV‑resistant paint, priming, and protective coatings add cost but lengthen mural life. Board members also pointed to recent local murals and suggested comparing per‑square‑foot rates used by similar cities and by regional associations such as FAPA. Several members said requiring applicants to document mural experience could be a tie‑breaker rather than an absolute bar to participation.
Wanda said CRA (Community Redevelopment Agency) funds have been discussed as a possible source to finance calls to artists, and she suggested staff would verify past mural budgets to calibrate the proposal. Board members asked staff to prepare a list of comparable projects, materials recommendations (including recommended primer and UV protection), and examples of language for the application that would request applicants’ mural experience, maintenance plans and proposed longevity.
A motion to table the mural call until the next meeting passed by voice vote; the board asked staff to return with cost comparables and proposed application language.
The board did not adopt a maximum budget at the meeting and directed staff to report back. Staff said the city has multiple prior murals and would seek detailed cost and materials data before setting final funding levels.
