Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Right Of Way Tree Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Linn County supervisors discuss revised tree-and-brush right-of-way policy, no vote taken
Summary
Supervisors and road department staff reviewed proposed policy OP-029 to clarify how the county manages trees and brush in secondary-road right of way. Staff said the policy formalizes existing practice; one supervisor asked for more time to review billing language and the two-week contractor window. No formal action was taken.
Linn County supervisors on March 5 reviewed a proposed update to the county's tree-and-brush control policy for secondary-road rights of way (policy OP-029) but did not adopt it, instead asking staff to revise language and return for further consideration.
The policy, presented by Jared Kelly, Operations Superintendent for the Road Department, is "a breakdown of how we handle and manage trees and brush within our right of way," Kelly said, saying the draft spells out procedures for trees that encroach into the county's defined clearance area so crews and the public have a shared reference.
Supervisor Brandy said she supported the department's safety focus but asked for more time to review specific provisions, especially the billing and scheduling provisions. "I would ask for time to further review the policy. I think there's a couple of things in there that maybe we'll have some questions on," she said, adding concern that the two-week window for homeowners to hire private contractors might be unrealistic for residents and could be misread as a county money grab.
Brad, identified in the meeting as the county engineer, said the intent of the policy is to formalize existing processes, not to change them. "The idea of the policies is to get something more formal, in writing as to our processes and procedures," Brad said, and noted the county tries to work with property owners and often performs work at no charge when crews are already in the area.
Staff and supervisors repeatedly framed the proposal as an effort to improve consistency and safety on county roads. Kelly explained the draft aims to clarify the county's 16-by-16 clearance guideline for vehicle passage and to provide consistent guidance when trees originate on private property and encroach into the county right of way.
Board members asked staff to refine language addressing: when the county will invoice property owners; the reasonableness of the two-week window for private contractors; and example scenarios that distinguish immediate hazards from non-immediate obstructions. The county engineer said Iowa code gives counties authority over right-of-way obstructions and that code language can be open to interpretation; the draft attempts to define those interpretations in local policy.
No motion to adopt OP-029 was made. Supervisors said there is no urgent need to finalize the policy and directed staff to return with revised language that more clearly specifies billing practice, timeframes for private work, and public-notice procedures.
The discussion featured a mix of technical and customer-service questions and closed with supervisors thanking road crews for ongoing winter operations.
