Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board votes: consent items, Little Barb Academy, professional development, FTE approvals, and student expulsion
Summary
At the meeting the DeKalb CUSD 428 Board of Education approved the consent agenda, authorized the Little Barb Academy start for 2025–26, approved a professional development request and the district FTE request for 2025–26, removed an after-school MOU from the agenda at a provider request, and approved a student expulsion.
The DeKalb CUSD 428 Board of Education recorded several formal actions during the meeting.
Votes at a glance
- Consent agenda: The board approved consent items 5b through 5I (personnel action items, purchase orders, payroll, accounts payable, financial reports, and two resolutions authorizing notice of nonrenewal and dismissal for certain temporary/part‑time teachers). Motion moved and seconded; roll call recorded members voting yes.
- Little Barb Academy: The board approved the Little Barb Academy proposal for the 2025–26 school year. Motion moved and seconded; roll call recorded members voting yes.
- Impactful Leadership professional development: The board approved attendance and associated professional development request for the Impactful Leadership Conference (April 16–19, 2025). Motion moved and seconded; roll call recorded members voting yes.
- FTE request for 2025–26: The board approved the district’s FTE request for the 2025–26 school year after discussion about specific positions (including a multilingual instructional coach and a warehouse specialist). Motion moved and seconded; roll call recorded members voting yes.
- Removal of agenda item G (MOU with Boys & Girls Club): The board voted to remove item G from new business at the request of the Boys & Girls Club; motion moved and seconded and the board approved by roll call.
- Student discipline (expulsion): The board approved the expulsion of student number 31825 as presented. Motion moved and seconded; roll call recorded members voting yes.
Where votes were recorded by roll call, the transcript captured members answering “Yes” in sequence; the board did not record any “No” votes or abstentions in the roll-call sequences shown in the meeting record provided.
The motions were introduced and seconded from the dais; some motions and seconds were not identified by name in the transcript. The board moved to adjourn into closed session at the meeting’s end.
