Senate Government Operations advances procurement, appropriations and transparency bills; research-access measure parked

The Senate Committee on Government Operations met March 18, 2025, and moved forward on a package of bills on lobbying, procurement, appropriations and internal government processes while deferring a measure on researcher access to nonpublic government records for further work.

The panel approved a committee draft for House Bill 412, House Draft 1 (relating to lobbying), adopted a revised approach for House Bill 1424 (appropriations transfers) that replaces a hard prohibition with quarterly reporting to the Legislature, and accepted changes to procurement-related bills including a $1,500,000 cap tied to a protest-bond provision (House Bill 1297, HD1) and removal of a forfeiture section. Lawmakers also debated a proposal (House Bill 1187, HD1) to prioritize locally grown flowers and leis in state purchases and requested more clarity on enforcement and exceptions.

Why it matters: several bills would change rules that affect day-to-day state purchasing, contractor appeals and how agencies report budgetary transfers — areas that can affect vendor behavior, department operations and legislative oversight.

House Bill 131 (Office of Information Practices): parked, privacy concerns The committee heard extensive oral testimony and questions on House Bill 131, which would clarify the Office of Information Practices’ (OIP) rulemaking authority to allow agencies to disclose government records to researchers under defined circumstances. Ben Kreps of the Public First Law Center said, “We strongly support this bill alongside with the office of information practices,” arguing it merely clarifies OIP’s ability to adopt uniform rules and does not automatically release records.

Hawaiian Electric’s associate general counsel James Abraham urged caution, citing risks that confidential critical-infrastructure information could be exposed and proposed amendments to preserve existing statutory exceptions. Representatives of several state agencies — including the University of Hawaii system, Department of Land and Natural Resources, Department of Labor and Industrial Relations and Department of Human Services — submitted written comments or raised concerns in testimony about definitions, aggregation of data and administrative capacity.

During questioning, Senator San Buenaventura pressed OIP on whether the office already had rulemaking authority under HRS chapter 92F and whether the bill would leave critical definitions to administrative rulemaking. OIP staff said the proposed statutory change would use permissive language (“may”) and that the office planned to develop rules after the law’s passage informed by real-world requests, not to immediately adopt broad rules. The committee said it lacked sufficient support to move the bill forward in this form and “parked” HB 131 for further work to tighten definitions of “research” and “researcher.” (Action: HB 131 — parked; no final adoption.)

House Bill 1424 (appropriations transfers): prohibition replaced by reporting House Bill 1424 would have prohibited transfers between payroll (wages/positions) and operating expenses except to fulfill the legislature’s original purpose. Committee discussion focused on the practical need for flexibility when departments face mid-year federal grant changes and on transparency for chairs who need oversight of reallotments.

Keith Regan, comptroller, explained the current practice allowing transfers from payroll to other current expenses when savings occur and said those transfers frequently happen late in the fiscal year. Committee members and budget staff agreed to remove the categorical prohibition and instead require quarterly reporting to the Legislature when such transfers are made. The committee adopted that change as a Senate Draft 1 to preserve administrative flexibility while improving legislative oversight. (Action: HB 1424 HD1 SD1 — amended to require quarterly reporting; passed to conference.)

Procurement and protest bonds: HB 1297 and related procurement bills The committee took up several procurement measures. On House Bill 1297 HD1 (administrative protest bond rules), multiple construction-industry groups, subcontractors and trade associations opposed a provision in the draft that would have created immediate forfeiture of protest bonds to the general fund for losing protesters. Testimony noted that Act 162 from the prior session had aligned Hawaii with other states’ practices and that Section 2 of the draft would undo recent changes.

The committee removed the contested forfeiture language, set a recommended protest-bond cap of $1,500,000 on the special fund provision for the procurement office, and approved technical edits. The committee report will explain the rationale and cite Hawaii Rules and HRS provisions that frame frivolous-protest standards. (Action: HB 1297 HD1 SD1 — section 2 removed; $1,500,000 cap noted; measure adopted with technical changes.)

House Bill 1187 (locally grown flowers and leis): enforcement, burdens debated Senators debated House Bill 1187 HD1, which phases in requirements to prioritize locally grown flowers and leis in state purchases. The State Procurement Office supported the bill but warned about challenges to verification. Senator San Buenaventura and other members raised enforcement and implementation questions: how would agencies verify local origin, must vendors certify, and what exemptions would apply when local supply is unavailable? The bill’s sponsor and procurement staff said agencies could rely on vendor certifications and use existing contract remedies (suspension/debarment) if vendors misrepresented origin, but members requested clearer exceptions and a workable enforcement mechanism before final passage. The committee chose to move HB 1187 forward “as is” with notes in the committee report about implementation concerns and enforcement options. (Action: HB 1187 HD1 SD1 — moved forward; reservations recorded; committee to note enforcement concerns in report.)

Other measures and votes at a glance The committee adopted or advanced a number of additional bills with technical amendments or agreed Senate Drafts. Notable outcomes recorded by the committee clerk at the hearing end included: - HB 412 HD1 (lobbying): Adopted as SD1 with editorial amendments and committee report language about potential effects on social service nonprofits; measure passes. - HB 792 HD1 (office of the legislative analyst): Senate Draft 1 created; effective-date adjustment and further review requested; measure passes. - HB 1153 HD1 (funding adjustments; supplemental allotments and protocol fund cap): Committee accepted Budget & Finance amendments and adopted SD1. - HB 1153: accepted with amendments; measure passes. - HB 1297 HD1 (procurement protest-bond rules): Section 2 removed, cap noted; measure adopted with technical edits; one senator registered a reservation. - HB 988 HD1 and HB 997/other procurement bills: held for additional coordination with other committees or sent forward with deadline changes as noted in committee reports. (For bill-specific vote tallies the committee record showed unanimous or adopted dispositions and noted individual reservations where recorded.)

What’s next The committee chair directed staff to work with OIP and affected agencies on refined statutory language for HB 131 and tasked budget staff and department procurement officers to prepare implementation guidance and reporting language where the committee requested more oversight. Several measures were moved to conference with committee drafting instructions or will return with Senate Drafts reflecting the agreed reporting and technical changes.

— End —