Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the County Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Henry County finance staff reports $17.7 million favorable forecast, commissioners press for $8 million clarification

2701023 · March 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County finance staff told the Board of Commissioners the county is trending $17.7 million favorable for the year after property tax collections from a 3‑mill increase; commissioners pressed staff to explain a previously cited $8 million figure, and staff agreed to follow up.

Henry County finance staff presented a midyear update on finances Tuesday, saying year‑to‑date revenues stand at about $225 million and the county is projecting a $17,700,000 favorable variance for the full year after recognizing property tax collections tied to a 3‑mill increase.

Why it matters: Property taxes make up roughly 42% of the county’s revenues, and the board approved the millage increase last year to fund public safety, personnel, deferred maintenance and capital projects. Commissioners pressed staff for clarity about an earlier reference to an $8 million favorability; staff said it will review past presentations and report back.

In the presentation, the finance presenter (identified in the record as county finance staff) said the county had collected about 85.9% of budgeted revenue and was projecting year‑end expenditures of about $166 million (63.8% of appropriations) with an overall forecasted favorability of $17.7 million. The presenter said unfavorable expense items — chiefly contractor services, legal costs and inmate medical services — are being offset by salary savings in other departments.

Commissioner Kevin Lewis and Commissioner Ellis (identified in the transcript) pressed staff about a previously referenced $8 million favorability. The finance presenter said the $8 million reference will be researched and that staff would “go back and find out where I made that statement” and return with an answer. Later in the meeting staff told the board they would provide the requested information before noon that day.

The presenter also reviewed impact fees, SPLOST (local option sales tax) collections and expenditures, and the county’s forecast process, which uses historical data and coordination with the tax assessor and tax commissioner.

Notable figures from the presentation: year‑to‑date revenues ~$225,000,000; projected full‑year favorability ~$17,700,000; projected unfavorable expense variance ~$1,200,000; property taxes ~42% of revenues; projected local match and capital set‑asides tied to prior planning.

The board did not take a formal vote on the forecast itself; commissioners requested follow‑up documentation on the $8 million figure and additional detail on expenditure trends.