Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parking Management topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Slate Canyon parking program shows early enforcement gains; council to reassess Joaquin and permit-fee structure

2700326 · March 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Councilors reviewed the Slate Canyon overnight-parking program, heard that enforcement citations increased and calls for service fell, and asked staff to return with an assessment and options for Joaquin neighborhood and a citywide review of parking-permit fees.

Councilors on Jan. 7 discussed parking-management efforts in Slate Canyon and Joaquin neighborhoods and asked staff to provide a public reassessment of outcomes and fee structures.

Council staff said Provo allocated roughly $28,000 in general funds in FY24 to install signage and convert a part-time enforcement position to full time for Slate Canyon. “So the council used general funds of approximately $28,000 to fund the signage, and the fulfillment of, moving a part time employee to a full time,” Justin Harrison said.

Sandy (parking operations staff) reported that Slate Canyon has shown positive signs: "We're seeing significant improvement on enforcement citations written there and calls for service through Paul and or through the 3311 system. So we're feeling again very positive about it." Several councilors said they had constituent questions and requested a public look-back to determine whether a parking-permit program is warranted in Joaquin after the ban had been in place for a period.

Councilors also raised long-standing concerns about inconsistent parking-permit fees across city permit areas. One councilor said administrative costs vary dramatically and that some areas are being charged $15 to $100 while program costs can be much higher; staff said fee harmonization was included in a city fee-recovery study and in a transportation/finance work item.

Why it matters: parking-management programs are administratively intensive and politically sensitive. Council members asked for a reassessment of Slate Canyon outcomes, a public discussion on Joaquin, and a cross‑city review of permit fees and cost recovery before any broader permit rollouts.

Next steps: staff will schedule a work-session update to present enforcement data, resident feedback, and options for Joaquin, and will include fee‑recovery analysis for permit areas so the council can decide whether to pursue a permit program or other tools.